Icd 20 Code For Diabetes

Share on facebook

Icd-10, Part 4: How To Code For Diabetic Retinopathy

Written By: Elizabeth Cottle, CPC, OCS, Rajiv R. Rathod, MD, MBA, Sue Vicchrilli, COT, OCS, and E. Joy Woodke, COE, OCS Finding the ICD-10 codes for diabetic retinopathy can be tricky. They are not listed in Chapter 7, Diseases of the Eye and Adnexa (H00-H59), but are in the diabetes section (E08-E13) of Chapter 4, Endocrine, Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases. Retinal complications. To further confuse matters, the most common retinal complications are in Chapter 7, not Chapter 4. Examples include vitreous hemorrhage (H43.1-), traction detachment of retina (H33.4-), and rubeosis iridis (H21.1-). New options. ICD-10 features codes for diagnoses that don’t currently have codes. These include drug- or chemical-induced diabetes mellitus (E09.-); gestational diabetes (Q24.4-); neonatal diabetes mellitus (P70.2); and postpancreatectomy, postprocedural, or secondary diabetes mellitus (E13.-). Changes in Documentation Some terms that you’re using in charts—such as “NIDDM,” “controlled,” and “uncontrolled”—will be obsolete when ICD-10 starts on Oct. 1, 2015. Instead, diabetes documentation should address the following questions: Is it type 1 or type 2? Is there diabetic Continue reading >>

Share on facebook

Popular Questions

  1. asmith79

    I am looking for any information on coding Diabetes, Type 2, uncontrolled for ICD 10. In a recent educational discussion there was some confusion on which was the appropriate code to use, E11.9 or E11.65. The thought behind E11.65 is that the terms "uncontrolled" and "out of control" have the same meaning. When you look in the alpha index under diabetes, out of control, ( page 95) , it directs you to code "Diabetes, specificed type, with hyperglycemia" which would take you to E11.65.
    During the discussion some argued that the terms "uncontrolled" and "inadequately controlled" or "out of control" did not have the same meaning. Does any one have any documentation supporting or disputing this?
    Also, it was brought up that since our chart just said "uncontrolled" how could we use the code E11.65 since it specifically stated hyperglycemia? Is there any documentation out there stating that "uncontrolled" diabetes refers to hyperglycemia?
    Anything would be appreciated!
    Angela Smith CPC, CFPC, COBGC

  2. BenCrocker

    Found this: http://journal.ahima.org/2012/05/16/...n-icd-10-cm-4/ Apparently ICD 10 doesn't use the term UNCRONTROLLED anymore. It's either inadequately controlled, Out of control, or Poorly controlled.

  3. mitchellde

    Originally Posted by BenCrocker
    Found this: http://journal.ahima.org/2012/05/16/...n-icd-10-cm-4/ Apparently ICD 10 doesn't use the term UNCRONTROLLED anymore. It's either inadequately controlled, Out of control, or Poorly controlled. The problem I have with articles like this is that this is someone's version or opinion and they wrote an article. At no time is an official source cited for that statement. I agree that diabetes with hyperglycemia is an out of control disease process, however I do not agree that just because the provider documents "uncontrolled", that this is always what they are referencing. In other words a diabetic patient that does not always adhere to proper diet or does not take the insulin correctly, while they may not yet be hyperglycemic, the provider may document the diabetes is poorly controlled. The coding guidelines do not direct us to code uncontrolled status as diabetes with hyperglycemia. And the classification does not have a listing for diabetes, uncontrolled, or uncontrolled, diabetes. Without an official source, I will default to , if the provider does not state diabetes with hyperglycemia, then it cannot be coded that way.
    Another point to consider on this, an endocrinologist once told me that the reason the ICD-9 classification choices state, uncontrolled, or not stated as uncontrolled instead of uncontrolled vs controlled, is that diabetes is truly never in a "controlled" state and the reason this is not stated this way in ICD-10 CM is because the physician does not need to document this, it is understood that the reason we monitor the diabetic patient as closely as we do is because they are never truly under control. He had a lot more to say on this subject and it does make sense.
    So I would hesitate to put stock in an article that makes a bold statement but does not back it up.

  4. -> Continue reading
read more close

Related Articles

  • What Is The Icd 10 Code For Diabetes Type 2?

    Jeffrey D. Lehrman DPM FASPS There have been some changes to the ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting that affect podiatrists. These changes are for the 2017 fiscal year and went into effect October 1, 2016. There are now specific codes for bunion, bunionette and bilateral tarsal tunnel syndrome. There was also a significant change involving coding for type 2 diabetes. In the first year of ICD-10, all of the E11- codes for type ...

    diabetes Jan 6, 2018
  • What Is The Icd 10 Code For Uncontrolled Diabetes?

    ICD-10 is upon us, and many offices are feeling anxious. Your anxiety is not unfounded. Transitioning from the 13,000 code ICD-9 system to the 68,000 code ICD-10 system is pretty intimidating. Diabetes codes have undergone some of the most significant changes, according to the American Academy of Ophthalmic Executives (AAOE). With 29 million Americans now suffering from the disease, it’s critical for physicians across specialties to correctly c ...

    diabetes Dec 30, 2017
  • Icd 10 Code For Diabetes Mellitus Unspecified

    Field Name Field Value Field Description Revision 10th Revision Defines ICD code revision (“10th Revision”) Code Type Diagnosis Specifies the type of code (Diagnosis / Procedure) Code E118 ICD-10-CM or ICD-10-PCS code value. Note: dots are not included. Diagnosis coding under this system uses 3–7 alpha and numeric digits The ICD-10 procedure coding system uses 7 alpha or numeric digits Description Type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified c ...

    diabetes Dec 30, 2017
  • Icd 10 Code For Diabetes Type 1

    Bones are typically resistant to bacterial colonization, but events such as trauma, surgery, the presence of foreign bodies, or the placement of prostheses may disrupt bony integrity, or a result of a spread after bacteremia, and lead to the onset of bone infection caused by an infectious organism, or osteomyelitis. In ICD-10-CM, osteomyelitis is differentiated as acute, subacute, or chronic. A subacute infection is differentiated from an acute i ...

    diabetes Dec 30, 2017
  • Icd 10 Code For Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 Poorly Controlled

    Most coders can quickly come up with 250.00. And if the physician only documented diabetes mellitus, that’s the correct ICD-9-CM code. If a physician doesn’t document complications or type of diabetes, coders default to code 250.00 (diabetes mellitus without mention of complications), says Jill Young, CPC, CEDC, CIMC, president of Young Medical Consulting, LLC, in East Lansing, MI. However, 250.00 is not necessarily the best code to describe ...

    diabetes Dec 30, 2017
  • Icd 10 Code For Insulin Dependent Diabetes

    International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision Chapter Blocks Title I A00–B99 Certain infectious and parasitic diseases II C00–D48 Neoplasms III D50–D89 Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs and certain disorders involving the immune mechanism IV E00–E90 Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases V F00–F99 Mental and behavioural disorders VI G00–G99 Diseases of the nervous sy ...

    insulin Dec 30, 2017

Popular Articles

More in diabetes