diabetestalk.net

Diabetes In The 1960s

Share on facebook

Original Research Socioeconomic Gradients In Cardiorespiratory Disease And Diabetes In The 1960s: Baseline Findings From The Gpo Study

Summary Objectives To describe the socioeconomic distribution of risk factors for cardiorespiratory disease and diabetes in employed women and men in the late 1960s. Study design and methods Cross-sectional data were collected from 3345 General Post Office (GPO) employees in London, via a questionnaire and clinical examination, between October 1966 and April 1967. Results Our occupational grade classification conformed to expected patterns of greater car ownership and gardening among higher-grade women and men, and greater height in higher-grade men (highest–lowest grade 175.0–170.7 cm, P<0.001). A strong inverse grade gradient in bronchitis (2.1–9.4%, P<0.001) and a strong positive gradient in FEV1 (3.10–2.58 l, P<0.001) were observed in men, although smoking was less consistently associated with grade. There was no consistent inverse association between grade and any cardiovascular risk factor in either sex, but strong inverse gradients in prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (5.1–18.2%, P<0.001) and 2-h glucose (4.14–4.25 mmol/l, P<0.001) in non-diabetic men. Using car ownership as an alternative measure of socioeconomic position, findings in men were repli Continue reading >>

Share on facebook

Popular Questions

  1. qtoffer

    Sugar industry paid scientists to blame saturated fat instead of sugar for CHD in 1960s

    Article in today's NY Times about a manuscript in today's JAMA Internal Medicine. Research and nutrition policy in the 1960s and 1970s was largely shaped by sugar industry trade groups. No surprise here. As a PhD biochemist and former vascular biology researcher, I'm always skeptical of any new research involving diet or heart disease. Always follow the money by identifying the research lead sponsor. My PhD advisor accepted funding from the Tobacco Institute because her research shifted blame for cardiovascular risk away from cigarettes.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/13/we...me-to-fat.html
    http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/arti...icleid=2548255

  2. Nan OH

    Many forget that just because a university did the study/research and published their findings; some one paid for it. There are popular books by doctors that do have some valid science but they still make money from the sale of the books or video programs/seminars. Most websites have paid sponsors.

  3. CalgaryDiabetic

    That is why some of the research should be Govt funded. Although in this case because of big corn, Govt was on the side of HFCS and any research showing that it was sugar and not fat would not have been funded by them either.

  4. -> Continue reading
read more close

Related Articles

  • Diabetes In The 1960s

    The sugar industry began funding research that cast doubt on sugar’s role in heart disease — in part by pointing the finger at fat — as early as the 1960s, according to an analysis of newly uncovered documents. The analysis published Monday is based on correspondence between a sugar trade group and researchers at Harvard University, and is the latest example showing how food and beverage makers attempt to shape public understanding of nutri ...

    diabetes Dec 7, 2017
  • Why Is Diabetes Called Diabetes

    Diabetes is a disease in which your blood glucose, or blood sugar, levels are too high. Glucose comes from the foods you eat. Insulin is a hormone that helps the glucose get into your cells to give them energy. With type 1 diabetes, your body does not make insulin. With type 2 diabetes, the more common type, your body does not make or use insulin well. Without enough insulin, the glucose stays in your blood. You can also have prediabetes. This me ...

    diabetes Dec 29, 2017
  • What Is The Difference Between Type One Diabetes And Type Two Diabetes?

    JDRF is the leading global organization focused on type 1 diabetes (T1D) research. The goal of JDRF research is to improve the lives of all people affected by T1D by accelerating progress on the most promising opportunities for curing, better treating, and preventing T1D. The confusion that arises with the difference between T1D and type 2 diabetes (T2D) is simply from a general lack of knowledge and education about the disease. The following inf ...

    diabetes Jan 4, 2018
  • What Is The Difference Between Diabetes Mellitus And Diabetes Insipidus?

    1 Answer Diabetes mellitus: It is one of the diseases caused by deficiency of glucose. It is of two types: type 1and type 2. Diabetes Insipidus: It is also one of the diseases caused by dehydration. It occurs when the body has looses its water. answered by chaithra edited by Lifeeasy Biology ...

    diabetes Jan 6, 2018
  • Diagnostic Criteria For Diabetes Mellitus According To American Diabetes Association

    Go to: DEFINITION AND DESCRIPTION OF DIABETES MELLITUS Diabetes is a group of metabolic diseases characterized by hyperglycemia resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action, or both. The chronic hyperglycemia of diabetes is associated with long-term damage, dysfunction, and failure of differentorgans, especially the eyes, kidneys, nerves, heart, and blood vessels. Several pathogenic processes are involved in the development of diab ...

    diabetes Jan 4, 2018
  • In What Ways Is Diabetes Insipidus Similar To Diabetes Mellitus

    The word diabetes is related to excess urination or polyuria. In physiology, we study two types of diabetes. One is diabetes mellitus, and other is diabetes insipidus. Both of the diseases are way different from each other due their cause and origin etc., but they have one thing in common: excess urination. Diabetes mellitus is a most common type of diabetes; it is characterized by excess glucose level in the blood that is followed by excess urin ...

    diabetes Dec 28, 2017

Popular Articles

More in diabetes